Various writers have suggested that the fabled "Hanging Gardens of Babylon" were early examples of hydroponic gardening. One might ask whether such gardens ever truly existed, and what evidence for them has been identified, along with other related questions.

From a purely historical perspective, the existence of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon remains one of antiquity’s great unsolved mysteries. While the gardens are celebrated as one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, no definitive archaeological evidence has ever been found at the traditional site of Babylon to confirm their existence.

Classical Sources: Ancient Greek and Roman writers such as Strabo, Diodorus Siculus, and Philo of Byzantium described the gardens as a marvel of engineering, with tiered terraces of lush vegetation irrigated by an advanced system drawing water from the Euphrates River.

Babylonian Records: Despite extensive records from Nebuchadnezzar II (the king traditionally credited with building the gardens), there is no mention of such a garden or the engineering feats required to sustain it in any Babylonian texts or inscriptions.

Archaeological Excavations: Excavations at Babylon have failed to uncover evidence of the gardens or their irrigation systems. Some suggest that any remains might lie beneath the current course of the Euphrates, which is not safely accessible for excavation.

The Nineveh Hypothesis

A compelling modern theory, championed by Oxford Assyriologist Dr. Stephanie Dalley, posits that the gardens were not in Babylon at all, but in Nineveh, the capital of the Assyrian Empire, built by King Sennacherib (r. 704–681 BCE).

Assyrian Inscriptions: Sennacherib left detailed accounts of constructing a “wonder for all peoples”—a garden complex with advanced irrigation, including water-raising screws, and a system of aqueducts that brought water from distant mountains to Nineveh.

Archaeological Finds: Excavations at Nineveh have revealed extensive aqueducts and evidence of sophisticated water management, matching descriptions of the gardens’ engineering. Reliefs from Sennacherib’s palace depict lush, terraced gardens resembling classical accounts.

Linguistic and Historical Confusion: The name “Babylon” (meaning “Gate of the Gods”) was sometimes used for other Mesopotamian cities, and Nineveh itself was referred to as “New Babylon” after the Assyrian conquest, possibly leading to later confusion in Greek and Roman sources.

Some scholars suggest the Hanging Gardens may be a literary or symbolic creation, inspired by the grandeur of Mesopotamian civilization, or a misinterpretation of other monumental structures such as ziggurats or palace gardens. The lack of contemporary Babylonian evidence and the reliance on much later Greek and Roman accounts fuel this skepticism.

Conclusion

From a non-religious, evidence-based perspective, there is no direct archaeological evidence that the Hanging Gardens existed in Babylon as traditionally described.

Strong circumstantial and archaeological evidence suggests a real, monumental garden complex existed in Nineveh under Sennacherib, which may have inspired or been conflated with the legend of the Hanging Gardens.

The gardens’ legendary status likely results from a blend of historical reality, later embellishment, and cultural confusion over time.

Thus, while the “Hanging Gardens of Babylon” as described by classical writers may not have existed in Babylon, a remarkable ancient garden—possibly the true inspiration—very likely did exist in Nineveh. The legend endures as a testament to the ingenuity and ambition of ancient Mesopotamian civilizations, even if its precise historical reality remains unresolved.

The "Hanging Gardens of Babylon" are not mentioned anywhere in the Bible. And lo it has come to pass, that while the Bible does discuss Babylon and King Nebuchadnezzar II—who is traditionally credited with building the gardens—there is no scriptural reference to the gardens themselves in any biblical text. Ancient descriptions of the gardens come from later Greek and Roman writers, as well as historians like Berossus and Josephus, but not from biblical sources.

Some later traditions and historical writings outside the Bible, such as those by Josephus, attribute the gardens to Nebuchadnezzar as a gesture to please his wife, but these accounts are not found in the biblical narrative. Thus, any association between the Hanging Gardens and the Bible is indirect, relying on historical context rather than explicit mention.

What generally accepted evidence suggests that the "Hanging Gardens of Babylon" were hydroponic in nature, that is, that soil-less techniques were fundamental to its operation?

The hypothesis that the Hanging Gardens of Babylon employed hydroponic (soil-less) techniques is primarily based on interpretations of ancient irrigation systems described in historical accounts, though direct archaeological evidence remains elusive. Here’s an analysis of the proposed evidence and its limitations:

Key Arguments for Hydroponic Design

1. Advanced Irrigation Systems

Chain Pumps and Archimedes’ Screw: Classical descriptions and modern reconstructions suggest water was lifted from the Euphrates River using mechanical systems like chain pumps (bucket chains powered by humans or animals) or early versions of the Archimedes’ screw. This water was then distributed through terraced channels.

Tiered Water Channels: The gardens’ tiered design allowed water to cascade downward, potentially creating a closed-loop system where nutrient-rich water circulated continuously—a hallmark of hydroponics.

2. Structural Constraints

Weight Limitations: The gardens’ elevated terraces (reportedly 75+ feet high) would have struggled to support deep soil beds. Some scholars argue that lighter, soil-free growing mediums like reed mats or gravel might have been used, with plants rooted directly in water channels.

Waterproofing Materials: Accounts mention lead-lined terraces and bitumen-coated bricks to prevent leakage, which aligns with hydroponic systems requiring controlled water retention.

3. Historical and Textual Clues

Ancient Descriptions: Greek historian Strabo noted the gardens’ “water engines” and terraces “overlaid with lead,” while Berossus (3rd century BCE) described an “artificial mountain” with irrigated plants—details some interpret as soil-less cultivation.

Modern Interpretations: Scholars like Stephanie Dalley propose that Assyrian reliefs from Nineveh (often conflated with Babylon) depict garden irrigation systems resembling hydroponic principles.

Counterarguments and Limitations

Soil References: Many accounts, including the YouTube transcript and EZ GRO Garden, describe “deep soil beds” on the terraces, contradicting pure hydroponics. True hydroponics requires nutrient-enriched water, not soil.

Misuse of Terminology: The term “hydroponic” is often applied anachronistically (that is, some writers have in appropriately applied modern ideas to ancient events). While the gardens used advanced irrigation, no evidence confirms intentional soil-less growth or nutrient-doped water.

Lack of Direct Evidence: No Babylonian texts or archaeological remains explicitly describe hydroponic methods. The gardens’ existence itself remains debated, let alone their agricultural techniques.

Conclusion

While the Hanging Gardens’ irrigation systems may have been advanced for their times, describing them as “hydroponic” stretches available evidence. The gardens likely combined hydroponic-like water management (e.g., recirculating channels) with traditional soil-based cultivation, optimized for arid conditions. The hydroponic association stems more from modern reinterpretations of ancient engineering than definitive proof, underscoring the gardens’ enduring mystery.

1. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanging_G…
Hanging Gardens of Babylon - Wikipedia
2. All That's Interesting
allthatsinteresting.com/hanging-garden…
The Hanging Gardens Of Babylon: Was This Ancient Wonder Real?
3. RTF | Rethinking The Future
re-thinkingthefuture.com/case-studies/h…
The Hanging Gardens of Babylon: Ancient Paradise for the Living
4. ohioram.org
ohioram.org/the-hanging-ga…
The Hanging Gardens of Babylon: A Marvel of the Ancient World
5. Jodi Taylor Books
joditaylor.substack.com/p/unraveling-t…
Unraveling the Mystery: How the Hanging Gardens of Babylon Were Discovered in Nineveh
6. Answers In Genesis
answersingenesis.org/archaeology/lo…
Were the hanging gardens actually in Assyria?
7. reddit.com
reddit.com/r/AskHistorian…
Did the Hanging Gardens of Babylon actually exist, and has ... - Reddit
8. The Archaeologist
thearchaeologist.org/blog/the-const…
The Construction of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon
9. nationalgeographic
nationalgeographic.com/history/histor…
Were the Hanging Gardens of Babylon actually in Babylon?
10. World History Encyclopedia
worldhistory.org/Hanging_Garden…
Hanging Gardens of Babylon - World History Encyclopedia
11. The Independent
independent.co.uk/news/science/a…
The biggest wonder about the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? They
Oxford historian gathers evidence that proves ancient marvel was located 300 miles away
iraqiembassy.us favicon
12. Embassy of the Republic of Iraq in Washington, D.C.
iraqiembassy.us/in-the-news/on…
One of 7 wonders of the world finally tracked down
13. The Archaeologist
thearchaeologist.org/blog/the-myth-…
The Myth and Reality of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon
14. Jodi Taylor Books
joditaylorbooks.com/p/unraveling-t…
Unraveling the Mystery: How the Hanging Gardens of Babylon Were ... Featured in "A Symphony of Echoes by Jodi Taylor
15. britannica
britannica.com/video/creation…
The legend of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon | Britannica
16. ancientmesopotamia
ancientmesopotamia.org/structures/han…
Structures | Hanging Gardens of Babylon
17. biblicalarchaeology
biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-…
Where Are the Hanging Gardens of Babylon?